Search
Who's new
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 12 guests online.
Frontpage FeedActive Posters
Users posting in the last 30 days:
- Crystalnye7971 - 20 posts
Navigation
User login
Recent comments
-
smoked salmon (not verified):
-
carpentry contractor ma (not verified):
-
carpentry contractor ma (not verified):
-
rqjqqzfyada (not verified):
-
kamal (not verified):
-
business immigration canada (not verified):
-
business immigration canada (not verified):
-
abhishek644 (not verified):
-
abhishek644 (not verified):
-
Anonymous (not verified):
Recent Trackbacks
Popular Posts
- The Blogosphere: A Kosmos
- Workers: The Faceless, Interchangeable Cog
- Baby Steps or Cold Turkey
- Public Goods, Public Bads, and NASA
- Political Child Abuse
- Tell Me What to Do!
- Lessons from the Second City
- Economic Puzzle Involving Stock Ownership (Part II)
- Pop Culture Individualism
- Hope vs. Belief (Part II)
- Build Applications, Not Infrastructure
- May Day 2006: A Day of Remembrance
- The Hanover Street Shoe-Shine Boys
- Will the AMA Vote Against Self-Interest If I Become A Member?
- How to Combat Economic Ignorance: A Proposition
- Toward a Fallibilist Synthesis
- The Other Vouchers
- Strange Omissions
"Were it not for the
"Were it not for the expectation of monogamy, seeking other sexual or emotional partners would not be considered an act of cheating, infidelity, unfaithfulness, or disloyalty. Were it not for the expectation of monogamy, there would be no conflict, and thus no reason to feel lied to, get a divorce, and disintegrate the family structure."
Since you haven't noticed, this was tried. It was called "the 60s" (which, of course, extended well into the 70s and 80s). 98% of the people who tried it fled and wound up in monogamous (or mostly monogamous, or hypocritically polygamous) relationships, because it was chaos.
Do we really need to try it all again because "theoretically speaking" you see no good reason for a product of thousands of generations of experience?